Comments for “ODOT Statewide ATNI - Bike Data Needs”
-
Reason why Pacific City doesn't have an urban area designated?
-
Should there be a boundary around Alsea? Not sure why there isn't, so figured I would mention. There are some bike/ped project desires here.
-
May want to include Fish Hatchery rd. I believe they have some projects in their new TSP that includes it. Also a key connection for bike trails, etc.
-
Include this "hole"
-
Include Cape Arago from Coos Bay CL to Charleston
-
Add this gap
-
need to collect data to corner
-
Why is this segment only 1 sided rather than both?
-
Are we sure this actually an ODOT facility? It's not listed as so in TransGIS
-
Bicycle facilities are needed on both sides here as it's a connection between homes, transit, and the school along US30.
-
Currently have existing data on one side - do not need data for other side
-
Currently have existing data on one side - do not need data for other side
-
Is PF needed here?
-
Currently have existing data on one side - do we need data for other side?
-
Currently have existing data on one side of ramp - do we need data for other side?
-
Data need - only need data on one side of ramp?
-
Data need - need to connect to adjacent roadways
-
Currently have existing data for one side - do not need data here
-
Currently have existing data for one side, no other data needed
-
Data need - need to connect to adjacent roadways (missing data may be due to spatial location of urban boundary)
-
Data need - need to connect to adjacent roadways (missing data may be due to spatial location of urban boundary)
-
Data need - need to connect data to adjacent roadways
-
Data need - need to connect adjacent roadways
-
Missing data - need something to connect adjacent roadway segments
-
Does this ramp need data for both sides?