Comments for “ODOT Statewide ATNI - Ped Data Needs”
-
Funny gap here
-
We should look at all of the roads we own around NMI
-
Fill this gap
-
Maybe include 140 from OR62 to Kershaw? Uninc. White City
-
We are transferring to Medford north of here, but it's a parallel route to new 62 Bypass.
-
We have jurisdiction to Ohio on both Riverside and Court
-
I believe we gave this away
-
Include this segment from BB State Park to Bandon
-
Include this gap in Coquille
-
Include Cape Arago to here
-
Please include Cape Arago Hwy from Coos Bay through Charleston/7 Devils
-
Add this gap
-
Need to collect data to corner
-
This should probably be a parallel route along OR39
-
Seems confusing regarding this stretch: switches between data needed on one side, to parallel route, to data needs for both sides.
-
Is this frontage road actually ODOT? It doesn't show as so in TransGIS
-
Is this connection intended to go between Redmond and Sisters? Are the mile points correct?
-
Why are the ped needs all the way from Dufur to Redmond?
-
Not clear why yellow here. Parallel route (path) would be great. But people are biking, walking here and some improvements that I hope will be made in the future. Maybe get data just a bit west and west of the intersection to encompass the retail destinations and those riding on shoulder to Casino for work?
-
Not sure if I am getting this right. But Alsea may be interested in sidewalk (or a path) on both sides. Should this be blue?
-
Sweet Home would like sidewalk on both sides extending east. It is challenging. May not happen. But would be good to have data for both sides if desired.
-
Ped and bike facilities desired by community on this overpass, even though there is a parallel multi-use path. Have looked at with engineers, etc. Very long game, but desired and currently sub-standard sidewalks and no bike facilities.
-
Want ped data for both sides
-
Should have data for both sides here as well, I believe