Comments for “D3 CSP Stakeholder Input”

← Back to the map

Comments Box

Please be as specific as possible

Your Information

This information is optional and will not be displayed.

  1. February 02 2017

    2 lanes of travel with double left turn lane. No bike lane and missing segments of sidewalk - this would benefit from a road diet.

    Liked 0 times
  2. February 02 2017

    Missing sidewalk from Mills Station to Rockingham Dr.

    Liked 0 times
  3. February 02 2017

    The Segment Improvement for the City of Live Oak begins at Ash Street and ends a Ramsdell Drive is moving towards PA&ED. If the inventory database will show local bicycle facilities integrated with the State Highway System, please show the Live Oak Community Trail (Plan published in 2010) and information from the Live Oak Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trail Plan (published in 2016). Last, it could be a bit misleading to show Segment Improvements extending to Riviera Road and Paseo Ave. While there is an identified project, currently there is not date scheduled to move projects at these locations toward PA&ED.

    Liked 0 times
  4. February 02 2017

    The City of Yuba City desires that the Highway 99 segment through Yuba City be added as a planned segment improvement project. Consideration is to be taken for the enhanced movement of traffic through the City, potential widening, and complete street enhancement elements.

    Liked 0 times
  5. February 02 2017

    SacRT is working on a proposal to potentially improve the bike/ped facilities here, similar to what is constructed at Watt/50 and being proposed at 80/Richards in Davis. A separate bike/ped facility built along with or ahead of the light rail extension. Could be cheap option with huge benefits. Jeff Damon is the contact at SacRT. Should be incorporated into this plan and the SACOG bike/ped/trails master plan

    Liked 0 times
  6. February 02 2017

    Segment improvements along Highway 20 should include complete street elements designed to promote active modes of transportation and enhance the corridor's image.

    The City of Yuba City is interested in being actively involved with the project, including funding, design, and phasing.

    Liked 0 times
  7. February 02 2017

    When this bridge is replaced, or even before, a Class IV or I path should be constructed. Limited crossings of the Sac River for non-motorized users.

    Liked 1 time
  8. February 02 2017

    Better ped access and crossings needed here

    Liked 0 times
  9. February 02 2017

    Bike lanes should be added here with next maintenance project. There is room if go down to 11 foot travel lanes which is allowed in the Highway Design Manual.

    Liked 1 time
  10. February 02 2017

    Active Sustainable Trans Planning grant underway here to make improvements around the I-80/Watt Station. SacRT is the lead. Ped/bike improvements needed here.

    Liked 0 times
  11. February 02 2017

    Ped/bike improvements needed here. Lots of bridge crossing due to NGOs and people seeking shelter in park nearby. Class IV bikeway under construction along 12th Street, New TOD, and new light rail station planned at 12/Richards that will attract even more active transport travelers. Bojana Guiterrez in D3 TOps a good contact about this need.

    Liked 0 times
  12. February 02 2017

    Class IV or I path, please. Closes a huge gap in the American River crossings for bikes/peds

    Liked 0 times
  13. February 02 2017

    The city desires ped and bike improvements along 160 here, including improving some awkward intersections and traffic calming measures.

    Liked 0 times
  14. February 01 2017

    There is an active SACOG-led planning effort to improve bike/ped access in Cool. Greg Chew is the lead.

    Liked 1 time
  15. February 01 2017

    More accessible pedestrian crossings needed in this area. Long distances between signals and people sometimes sprint across 50.

    Liked 0 times
  16. February 01 2017

    This intersection could be made more friendly for pedestrians.

    Liked 0 times
  17. February 01 2017

    Road diet should be considered here. Implement streetscape improvements

    Liked 0 times
  18. February 01 2017

    New bike path crossing over river along SR 70 needed here. Sidewalks are not adequate and are heavily used. People passing each other often have to walk in the active travel lanes.

    Liked 0 times
  19. February 01 2017

    See American River Crossings Study. Sac City endorsed new bike path crossing here along I-5.

    Liked 0 times
  20. February 01 2017

    Class IV or Class I bike path needed here to connect this part of Sac and West Sac

    Liked 1 time
  21. February 01 2017

    Bike/ped improvements needed at this interchange

    Liked 0 times
  22. February 01 2017

    Bike/ped improvements needed at this interchange

    Liked 0 times
  23. February 01 2017

    Please determine what bicycle and pedestrain features are in the County Seat of Plumas County.

    Liked 0 times
  24. February 01 2017

    Contact Alex Fong in Caltrans to get details about the pedestrian overcrossing public outreach effort going on. Will replace existing POC in same footprint with enhancements and ADA improvements to make a better experience.

    Liked 0 times
  25. February 01 2017

    There are limited pedestrian facilities over the freeway, to accommodate peds between the housing on the west side of I505 and Winters. Potential complete streets project.

    Liked 1 time