Comments for “La Verne ATP Recommended Bikeways”
-
Partnership Project. If this was to be implemented it would need to be in tandem with Pomona. In the Pomona ATP Cycle 4 they show this as a Class IV East of White. Have we talked with them and aligned our plans to create a connected/consistent network?
Liked 2 times -
If Class I is proposed, it should be labeled with an asterisk. This would be highly conceptual, and not logical to the average person based on the current configuration and land uses of Arrow. However, after the completion of the Gold Line, and the buildout of Transit Oriented Development, the need may become more clear/firm. It will be important to separate this from some of the more immediate/actionable components of the plan, as this has been highly controversial in past discussions.
Liked 1 time -
Unclear why there would be Class I lanes North / South West of Wheeler
Liked 2 times -
Does the plan propose Class I separated bike lanes the entire length of Arrow, both North and South? What will this connect to on the San Dimas side?
Liked 2 times -
Class III, allows East / West connectivity to Metrolink / future Gold Line station without the need to use Bonita. Can be connected to 3rd street Class III / bicycle blvd via low-stress streets.
Liked 1 time -
Partnership Project. Work with Pomona to address Fulton. Provides North / South route and connectivity to Metrolink, and future Pomona Gold Line Station
Liked 1 time -
Partnerhsip Project. Use of Fulton provides a North / South route between La Verne and Pommona. Is also used by commuters accessing the Metrolink Station, providing La Verne better connection to this transit option.
Liked 1 time -
Improve this location to allow bicycle flow through. Allows avoiding White / Bonita interchange, long travel on White, by using Fulton.
Liked 1 time -
Does this meet the criteria to be a Bicycle Focused Intersection?
Liked 3 times -
Crossing major arterial with Class III / Bicycle Blvd should be indicated as a Bicycle Focus intersection
Liked 2 times -
If 3rd is recommended as a Class III / Bicycle Blvd, then this should be identified as a Bike Focused Intersection (same as when 3rd crossed Wheeler).
Liked 1 time -
Class III - This would be the street that would be used to enter / exit 3rd Street Class III
Liked 1 time -
Leads to a deadend?
Liked 0 times -
Shouldn't the Gold Line station be shown, and then the plan demonstrates how the network would allow connectivity?
Liked 2 times -
If there is a Class I / Class II network South of Arrow, why is there no connection on the North side? In essence, this is identified as a Bicycle Focused" intersection, with no proposal to improve the Northbound side.
Liked 0 times -
E Street is a "Pathway Arterial" on First Mile / Last Mile, but absent here?
Liked 0 times -
2nd is shown on First Mile / Last Mile plan, but absent here?
Liked 0 times -
This goes to where?
Liked 1 time -
Gold Line First Mile / Last Mile has then as a "Pathway Arterial", but it is left off this plan? These need to be reconciled
Liked 1 time -
Class I Bike Path? - First Mile / Last Mile project proposed using this in place ROW as a Class I, allowing connections to the Park, High school, and connecting into routes into the Gold Line Station.
Liked 1 time -
If 6th Street is being used as Class III - Bicycle Blvd due to connection with Roynon School (appropriate), then it should be routed down C to 5th Street so the East / West travel can continue.
Liked 0 times -
Barrier - Although Bell is a Class III (appropriately), the Commons Shopping Center cannot be entered from the South as the path utilizes starts with no ramp options. Bicycles, strollers, wagons, wheelchairs are prevented access.
Liked 3 times -
S/B Class III allowing continuation of East/West Travel rather than deadend use of 6th Street as shown on plan
Liked 1 time -
Class III - East/West Route ends into a deadend?
Liked 2 times -
Improve this existing bridge, to better accommodate bicycle usage, and 5th street as an East / West option.
Liked 1 time