Comments for “Safety Action Plan Feedback Map”

← Back to the map

Comments Box

Please be as specific as possible

Your Information

This information is optional and will not be displayed.

  1. July 11 2024

    Too dangerous for pedestrians or bikes

    Liked 1 time
  2. July 11 2024

    Need sidewalk gap closure and wider bike lane.

    Liked 0 times
  3. July 11 2024

    Need sidewalk gap closure and wider bike lane.

    Liked 0 times
  4. July 11 2024

    The statement requesting a walking path from the French Park neighborhood to Los Ranchos is absolutely asinine. This person either doesn't have school-age kids, or does care about their safety.
    Such a walking path, for elementary school kids, would expose them to almost 2.5 MILES of chances - chances at being run into, taken advantage of, kidnapped and any number of other things, including excessive exposure to the elements whenever they are either too warm, cold or wet. I though I walked a long way as a kid, but I may have walked a mile at the most; the disadvantaged kids in Oceano may walk home 3 miles from AG high school, but those are also high school who often choose to walk that distance, even with other options available.
    This seems like a rather extreme justification to support construction of a walking path along this corridor. There is already a plan to build one - however long that may take - but don't drag school kids into this.

    Liked 0 times
  5. July 11 2024

    Consider other options to control speeds if this is a real issue. The Uniform Traffic Control manual absolutely FORBIDS the use of stop signs as speed control devices. Cannot do it, DO NOT do it.

    Liked 0 times
  6. July 11 2024

    This location is not a hazard. I have driven through this intersection any number of times and have never had a n excessive delay in turning onto SR 46.
    If drivers would drive as they are supposed to - this includes turning drivers doing so at a reasonable rate of speed, there would be no issues and no "near misses". If you cannot accelerate reasonably, you should not be driving.

    Liked 0 times
  7. July 11 2024

    This location is not a hazard. I have driven through this intersection any number of times and have never had a n excessive delay in turning onto SR 46.
    If drivers would drive as they are supposed to - this includes turning drivers doing so at a reasonable rate of speed, there would be no issues and no "near misses". If you cannot accelerate reasonably, you should not be driving.

    Liked 0 times
  8. July 11 2024

    This location may cross a State highway, but this is not a Caltrans issue. Local pedestrians are a local agency - County - issue. I'm sure Caltrans would cooperate where possible, with their Complete Streets policy and all, but the solution has to come from the local community and their governmental representatives - the County.

    Liked 0 times
  9. July 11 2024

    I see comment indicating a need - if drivers in both directions would drive as intended, there would be no issues here.

    Liked 0 times
  10. July 11 2024

    Configuration of this intersection leads to impatience in some, confusion in others. This intersection needs to be improved with a new configuration or traffic controls for safety of ALL road users.

    Liked 1 time
  11. July 10 2024

    Left hand turn from Santa Fe onto westbound lane of Tank Farm Road is treacherous.

    Liked 1 time
  12. July 10 2024

    Pedestrians and bicyclists from the high density residential area south of 4th street and west of Vine are vulnerable due to lack of sidewalks, poor road conditions, and lack of protected crossing to east side of Vine where sidewalks do exist. Vehicles on Vine travel at high speed with limited sight distance at 2nd and 3rd due to hill crest between these streets which poses risks to pedestrian crossings. Sidewalks on west side of Vine north of 3rd Street and crosswalk would promote safety for this residential area.

    Liked 0 times
  13. July 08 2024

    Private vehicle parked in bike lane

    Liked 0 times
  14. July 08 2024

    No access currently available from development/Target area to SLO City Farm path

    Liked 0 times
  15. July 08 2024

    Pedestrian crossing here would be nice

    Liked 0 times
  16. July 08 2024

    No crosswalk near assisted living facility

    Liked 0 times
  17. July 08 2024

    Chorro St between downtown and foothill blvd has a speed limit of 25mph but traffic typically moves at a much higher speed. There are very few posted speed limit signs and some are obscured by vegetation. This poses a potential hazard for pedestrians

    Liked 0 times
  18. July 08 2024

    Propose pedestarian/bike bridge over the railroad tracks to Industarial Way never built

    Liked 0 times
  19. July 08 2024

    2 lanes of cars speeding downhill on Grand, + 3 offset cross streets, + left/right turns onto the freeway onramp, hilly, PLUS bikes, pedestrians, & preschool driveway--scary conflicts among all modes here daily, esp. ped/bike (I'm a preschool parent)

    Liked 0 times
  20. July 08 2024

    pedestrians and cyclist difficult to see at round-a-bouts on Tank Farm Road. trafic does not slow enough to allow safe entry of either into or across round-a-bout. Car drivers more concerned with car traffic at entering circle

    Liked 1 time
  21. July 08 2024

    limited vision ofpedestrians and autos not slowing at traffic circles on Tank Farm Road. Traffic never stops so pedestrians reluctant to cross into park. Pesestrian activated warning signal to traffic needed?

    Liked 0 times
  22. July 08 2024

    Have observed several instance of people crossing at this location. Walking to Broad to cross the street is too far out of the way--can this be a marked crossing?

    Liked 0 times
  23. July 08 2024

    Pedestrians crossing the road without crosswalk where cars drive fast

    Liked 0 times
  24. July 08 2024

    Needs better lighting. Unsafe to cross at all times, especially at night when it is hard to see pedestrians. Crosswalk needed between the SLO Apartment Complex and Rite Aid Parking Lot.

    Liked 0 times
  25. July 08 2024

    Unsafe crossing for cyclists and pedestrians. Very busy.

    Liked 0 times